The Key Verse Tradition

How do we interpret a large body of text, especially one that is written by multiple authors with a variety of perspectives with many things that seem to contradict? Have you ever talked to someone about a theological issue and you bring up a text of scripture that you feel fully supports your view? They might respond by even acknowledging your point, but then insisting there is another verse that either nuances or flatly contradicts your verse.

"Yes, it is true that James does say we are justified by works, but he can't mean justification before God because we must take into account Romans 3:22, etc."

This is a glimpse into the Key Verse tradition. It is very powerful.

It is an often completely unnoticed tendency to remember the Key Verses that support your views and use those to set up an interpretive grid through which you view the entire Bible. The Key Verse tradition is one utilized by evangelicals very often and with great success (see The Roman's Road, AWANA, 4 Spiritual Laws, John 3:16 signs, etc).

You think evangelicals memorize a ton of scripture?

Some do. But most, especially cradle evangelicals, have about 5-10 texts repeatedly reinforced throughout their lives. These they hide in their heart. These become their touchstones for their soteriology -- their understanding of salvation. It's somewhat like a child in a liturgical communion learning the Apostle's Creed.

Now Catholics do this as well. Or at least we try.

But when I see "Verse for the Week" in my local non-denominational, evangelical service bulletin or missionary newsletter, I think, "why this one, and not another?"

It's the Key Verse tradition.